Showing posts with label Facebook Timeline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook Timeline. Show all posts

Monday, April 2, 2012

Tumblr Adds Facebook Timeline Integration

Tumblr is joining the Facebook Timeline integration bandwagon.
The social blog announced today that sharing posts to Facebook would get “a billion times” easier. Tumblr posts now appear on your Facebook Timeline, News Feed and Ticker when you chose “send to Facebook.” Tumblr likes and replies will appear on Facebook, as well.
Tumblr users can adjust their blog settings to share posts on their Timelines. If you already have your Tumblr linked to Facebook, you’ll be get a notification that says, “We’ve improved Facebook sharing. Upgrade now.”
Your Tumblr posts will now be grouped together on Timeline — just like Spotify songs, Pinterest pins and Foursquare checkins — making Timelines easier to navigate.


1. Quadro
From the font to the layout, the Quadro theme is a close tie with the Pinterest pinboard.

Kinley Lite uses a very similar pinboard layout, as well as a similar color and font style.

Star-Aurora is another mosaic-style option with a bolder font.

The Meringue theme also has the same pinboard feel to it.

5. Nominal
This theme uses a crisp font, and has a clean, mosaic look.

6. Cargo
Cargo has the same mosaic asthetic as your Pinterest board, but it's a little more minimalist.

7. Canvas
This example includes text, however, it's still the same board-like layout. This theme also includes the infinite scroll option.

For Tumblr users who post mostly images, Tessellate is a no-brainer.

When you hover over the scattered stack of photos, the theme organizes into a neatly arranged board.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Facebook on New Timeline Apps: ‘We’re Going To See the Next Pinterest’

Facebook’s Open Graph has made it possible for developers of all sizes to tap into Facebook’s Timeline and post when their members listen to songs, browse for images, or read stories. Facebook’s Malorie Lucich told Social Times, “It’s a huge opportunity for startups. I think we’re going to see the next Pinterest come up through these kinds of integrations.”

People “gravitate to the types of activities they enjoy in the real world,” said Lucich, like fitness, fashion, and food.  The key is to base the app on some kind of action, like listening, watching, reading, or reaching a goal. If your site is about wine tasting, for example, users can post when they’ve tried a new wine.
In the end, all of the activity ends up in one box on each user’s profile page, giving members a look at what they’ve achieved throughout the year, whether they’ve logged every mile they’ve run or clipped every news article they’ve read. “It looks really beautiful on all the maps,” Lucich said.
For a startup company, the Timeline presents an opportunity to reach Facebook’s millions of users. Spotify recruited 4 million new users to its digital music service by streaming users’ playlists on Facebook. When Pinterest had its beta testers post images they liked on Pinterest to their Facebook Timelines, the site’s daily active Facebook user base grew by 60 percent.
In the last three months, Facebook has approved 3,000 Timeline apps that help people share their interests. A recent wave of 60 new apps expanded the offerings with videos from VEVO and fashion from Pose, among others.  But even companies that weren’t lifestyle-related found a way to get on board.
RockMelt created a social reading feature to introduce new users to its Web browser and iPhone app. Launched in 2010, the startup puts a social spin on popular browsers like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, and Mozilla Firefox. RockMelt has Facebook notifications, instant messaging, and updates from sites like Twitter and Tumblr built into the browser for easy access.
When making the decision to use the Open Graph, RockMelt CEO Eric Vishria told Social Times that “Facebook was a natural fit” for the socially-enabled browser. None of the other browsers had tried it yet, he added, “so we’re unique in that regard.”
With the Timeline app, users can turn on “social reading” to share the articles they read online with their friends on Facebook. The article appears on the timeline with the note, “recently read on RockMelt.”

News articles fall under the category of “safe content,” Vishria explained, which are things that people can share with their friends online without making things awkward. RockMelt connects to 150 “white-listed” sites, like CNN, that have safe content. “We want to make sure it’s a good experience,” he said.
RockMelt found that people were more likely to read an article that came from a friend.  Using the Facepile plugin, which shows the Facebook profile pictures of friends who have also read an article through RockMelt, has led to an increase in click-through rates of about 20 percent.
Users add an average of 14 new articles per day, most of which involve humor or breaking news. And once RockMelt’s users enable social reading, 75 percent of them choose to leave it on while they continue to browse the Internet. The most prolific social readers are between the ages of 18 and 34.
Facebook’s Timeline has also led to a 5 percent increase in new user growth for the browser.  To date, 2 million people have tried RockMelt and 100,000 of them now use it on a daily basis.  Said Vishria of the Facebook Timeline, “It’s a powerful thing.”

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Facebook Pages Race To Adopt Timeline, 8M Of 37M+ Upgraded In 10 Days

On March 30th, Facebook will forcibly migrate all Pages onto the Timeline redesign, but Facebook tells me it only took 10 days for 8 million of the more than 37 million Pages that have been set up to opt into the change. The stats are a sign of success that show the added features are ones admins want, considering tons of Facebook Pages get set up and forgotten about.
However, it will take a while to see whether Timeline actually helps Pages market more effectively. So far the most popular Pages that have switched haven’t seen growth rates increase. With more to look at, the Like button might be overshadowed.
Reach Generator which launched at the Facebook Marketing Conference and allows Pages to pay a fixed fee to guarantee distribution of their content to over 75% of their fans is picking up customers. Dr. Pepper reached 83% of its 8 million U.S. fans over a 28-day period, had a 140% increase in people talking about it on Facebook, and saw an 80% increase in engagement. Ford plans to buy logout page ads where big photos of their cars can be featured, which wouldn’t fit in Facebook’s tiny traditional sidebar ads.
Typically when Facebook launches redesigns they’re met with fear and apprehension. But Timeline’s big flashy cover banner seems to be pretty for Page admins to resist. There are some concerns about the removed ability to set a custom promotional app as a default landing page, but those are offset by eagerness for pinned posts, bigger photos, and more presentation flexibility.
Brands also probably didn’t want to get left behind by competitors, leading roughly 1 million Pages per day to migrate to Timeline in first days after its launch. Now they’re likely taking the time to go back, hide irrelevant or weak posts, and add milestone moments to their story. 2 weeks after launch and 2 more before the forced migration, Facebook tells me a “significant percentage” of Pages have switched. In its S-1 Facebook noted that 37 million Pages had been set up as of December 31, 2011.
While the long-tail of Pages are actively migrating to Timeline, Facebook’s most popular Pages have been conservative with their adoption. Only 8 of the top 20 Pages have migrated, and none of those have seen their rate of new fans increase significantly according to Inside Network’s PageData tracking service. In fact, some are seeing slower growth, possibly because users have to re-learn where the Like button is.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Google+ vs. Facebook: Which Is Best for Business?

Social media is an ideal way for a small business with a tiny advertising budget to get its name out there and interact with its customers. Integrating the parts of your online strategy is key, but sometimes, it's just not worth the effort to create a page on every social network out there.
Right now, Facebook brand pages are the go-to place for brands that want to be social, but Google+ recently entered the game, trying to present an alternative—or, at the least, a supplement.
Should your small business be on both Facebook and Google+? If not, which one's the way to go? Here's a breakdown of the factors to consider.
Userbase
Mark Zuckerberg's social behemoth has one glaring advantage: Its gargantuan user base is unparalleled. For a small business, it's nearly guaranteed that whoever your customers are, they're already on Facebook and know how to navigate it.
Google's network has nowhere near the amount of users as Facebook, but its audience is a bit more focused. However, the regular folks that go on Google+ don't check it as often as Facebook, so they are harder to engage. Facebook's users come back to check the site frequently, multiple times a day.
Engagement
There are a lot of similarities between the engagement features of Facebook and Google+'s brand pages. Facebook has the "like," and Google+ has the +1. Facebook has friend lists, and Google+ has Circles.
Unfortunately for Google+, Facebook completely dominates it on features. It's not even close. Whereas Google+ really only allows you to post pictures, Facebook offers a variety of ways for fans to interact with your brand. It has polls, apps, events, notes (mini blog posts) and even "friend activity," which shows when your friends are talking about your company.
Branding and customization
Pages on Google+ look very similar to the current iteration of Facebook. It has the same design with pictures at the top and a river of posts beneath it. Google+ pages are more minimalistic, with a lot of white space, whereas Facebook piles all of its features on its left-hand navigation bar.
But when Facebook releases its new Timeline for brands, things will be very different. For instance, the change in visual impact is huge. Businesses will be able to instantly grab eyes with a big branded banner at the top of the page. Meanwhile, Google+ will still have those five dinky pictures at the top.
Facebook's customization features go beyond anything Google+ has. It also allows you to embed e-commerce stores, make a page of trivia questions, set up a calendar and much more.
The bottom line
Google+ has its benefits, but it just doesn't match up to Facebook so far. Unless you have the time to spare to run a Google+ page, it's likely not worth the effort because the ability to engage consumers is so limited, and the breadth of audience is too. And when the Timeline comes to brand pages, Facebook will take another big step ahead of Google+.
For a small business, the biggest justification to use Google+ would be to supplement the brand's existing online presence. It's certainly worth it if you have the capability to run a Google+ page without slowing down everything else you're doing online.
But it's obvious that Facebook's brand pages are way ahead and should be the priority for a small business looking to engage its consumers online.
Do you have both a Facebook and Google+ profile? Which do you prefer and why?